As our loyal customer, some of them will choose different types of CISSP study materials on our website. As you can see, they still keep up with absorbing new knowledge of our CISSP training questions. Once you cultivate the good habit of learning our study materials, you will benefit a lot and keep great strength in society. Also, our CISSP practice quiz has been regarded as the top selling products in the market. We have built our own reputation in the market.

There is the registration process for ISC CISSP Certification Exam

ISC CISSP Certification Exam Registration ISC CISSP members may access the examination on-line for a reduced fee. To register, visit ISC CISSP Exam. To register for your exam online, you must provide certain information about yourself. There is no charge for this option. The information you provide will be used only to verify your identity and determine whether or not you are eligible to take the exam.

As elaborated in CISSP Dumps, you will be able to choose between three options:

• Register as an ISC Member
• Register as a Non-Member
• Register through a local testing center in the U.S. or Canada

>> CISSP Examcollection Dumps Torrent <<

Types Of ISC CISSP Exam Practice Test Questions

If we redouble our efforts, our dreams will change into reality. Although we might come across many difficulties during pursuing our dreams, we should never give up. If you still have dreams, our CISSP study materials will help you realize your dreams. Where is a will, there is a way. And our CISSP Exam Questions are the exact way which can help you pass the exam and get the certification with ease. Just have a try on our CISSP practice guide, then you will know you can succeed.

Introduction of ISC Certification

The CISSP certification was developed by the International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium (ISC) and is widely considered one of the most difficult certifications to attain. The CISSP exam tests for knowledge of concepts such as network security, software security, cryptography, physical security, and general security principles. Candidates must pass a rigorous 8-hour long exam and demonstrate proficiency in at least 10 out of 12 knowledge areas. Are worried about the study material for the exam? Keep calm, I have the solution. That solution is CISSP Dumps, that will guide and help in study for the CISSP exam.

ISC Certified Information Systems Security Professional Sample Questions (Q866-Q871):

NEW QUESTION # 866
This type of supporting evidence is used to help prove an idea or a point, however It cannot stand on its own, it is used as a supplementary tool to help prove a primary piece of evidence. What is the name of this type of evidence?

• A. Opinion evidence
• B. Corroborative evidence
• C. Circumstantial evidence
• D. Secondary evidence

Answer: B

Explanation:
This type of supporting evidence is used to help prove an idea or a point, however It cannot stand on its own, it is used as a supplementary tool to help prove a primary piece of evidence. Corrobative evidence takes many forms.
In a rape case for example, this could consist of torn clothing, soiled bed sheets, 911 emergency calls tapes, and prompt complaint witnesses.
There are many types of evidence that exist. Below you have explanations of some of the most common types: Physical Evidence
Physical evidence is any evidence introduced in a trial in the form of a physical object, intended to prove a fact in issue based on its demonstrable physical characteristics. Physical evidence can conceivably include all or part of any object.
In a murder trial for example (or a civil trial for assault), the physical evidence might include DNA left by the attacker on the victim's body, the body itself, the weapon used, pieces of carpet spattered with blood, or casts of footprints or tire prints found at the scene of the crime. Real Evidence Real evidence is a type of physical evidence and consists of objects that were involved in a case or actually played a part in the incident or transaction in question.
Examples include the written contract, the defective part or defective product, the murder weapon, the gloves used by an alleged murderer. Trace evidence, such as fingerprints and firearm residue, is a species of real evidence. Real evidence is usually reported upon by an expert witness with appropriate qualifications to give an opinion. This normally means a forensic scientist or one qualified in forensic engineering.
Admission of real evidence requires authentication, a showing of relevance, and a showing that the object is in "the same or substantially the same condition" now as it was on the relevant date. An object of real evidence is authenticated through the senses of witnesses or by circumstantial evidence called chain of custody.
Documentary Documentary evidence is any evidence introduced at a trial in the form of documents. Although this term is most widely understood to mean writings on paper (such as an invoice, a contract or a will), the term actually include any media by which information can be preserved. Photographs, tape recordings, films, and printed emails are all forms of documentary evidence.
Documentary versus physical evidence A piece of evidence is not documentary evidence if it is presented for some purpose other than the examination of the contents of the document. For example, if a blood-spattered letter is introduced solely to show that the defendant stabbed the author of the letter from behind as it was being written, then the evidence is physical evidence, not documentary evidence. However, a film of the murder taking place would be documentary evidence (just as a written description of the event from an eyewitness). If the content of that same letter is then introduced to show the motive for the murder, then the evidence would be both physical and documentary.
Documentary Evidence Authentication Documentary evidence is subject to specific forms of authentication, usually through the testimony of an eyewitness to the execution of the document, or to the testimony of a witness able to identify the handwriting of the purported author. Documentary evidence is also subject to the best evidence rule, which requires that the original document be produced unless there is a good
reason not to do so.
The role of the expert witness
Where physical evidence is of a complexity that makes it difficult for the average person to
understand its significance, an expert witness may be called to explain to the jury the proper
interpretation of the evidence at hand.
Digital Evidence or Electronic Evidence
Digital evidence or electronic evidence is any probative information stored or transmitted in digital
form that a party to a court case may use at trial.
The use of digital evidence has increased in the past few decades as courts have allowed the use
of e-mails, digital photographs, ATM transaction logs, word processing documents, instant
message histories, files saved from accounting programs, spreadsheets, internet browser
histories, databases, the contents of computer memory, computer backups, computer printouts,
Global Positioning System tracks, logs from a hotel's electronic door locks, and digital video or
audio files.
While many courts in the United States have applied the Federal Rules of Evidence to digital
evidence in the same way as more traditional documents, courts have noted very important
differences. As compared to the more traditional evidence, courts have noted that digital evidence
tends to be more voluminous, more difficult to destroy, easily modified, easily duplicated,
potentially more expressive, and more readily available. As such, some courts have sometimes
treated digital evidence differently for purposes of authentication, hearsay, the best evidence rule,
and privilege. In December 2006, strict new rules were enacted within the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure requiring the preservation and disclosure of electronically stored evidence.
Demonstrative Evidence
Demonstrative evidence is evidence in the form of a representation of an object. This is, as
opposed to, real evidence, testimony, or other forms of evidence used at trial.
Examples of demonstrative evidence include photos, x-rays, videotapes, movies, sound
recordings, diagrams, forensic animation, maps, drawings, graphs, animation, simulations, and
models. It is useful for assisting a finder of fact (fact-finder) in establishing context among the facts
presented in a case. To be admissible, a demonstrative exhibit must "fairly and accurately"
represent the real object at the relevant time.
Chain of custody
Chain of custody refers to the chronological documentation, and/or paper trail, showing the
seizure, custody, control, transfer, analysis, and disposition of evidence, physical or electronic.
Because evidence can be used in court to convict persons of crimes, it must be handled in a
scrupulously careful manner to avoid later allegations of tampering or misconduct which can
compromise the case of the prosecution toward acquittal or to overturning a guilty verdict upon
appeal.
The idea behind recoding the chain of custody is to establish that the alleged evidence is fact
related to the alleged crime - rather than, for example, having been planted fraudulently to make
someone appear guilty.
Establishing the chain of custody is especially important when the evidence consists of fungible
goods. In practice, this most often applies to illegal drugs which have been seized by law
enforcement personnel. In such cases, the defendant at times disclaims any knowledge of
possession of the controlled substance in question.
Accordingly, the chain of custody documentation and testimony is presented by the prosecution to
establish that the substance in evidence was in fact in the possession of the defendant.
An identifiable person must always have the physical custody of a piece of evidence. In practice,
this means that a police officer or detective will take charge of a piece of evidence, document its
collection, and hand it over to an evidence clerk for storage in a secure place. These transactions,
and every succeeding transaction between the collection of the evidence and its appearance in
court, should be completely documented chronologically in order to withstand legal challenges to
the authenticity of the evidence. Documentation should include the conditions under which the
evidence is gathered, the identity of all evidence handlers, duration of evidence custody, security
conditions while handling or storing the evidence, and the manner in which evidence is transferred
to subsequent custodians each time such a transfer occurs (along with the signatures of persons
involved at each step).
Example
An example of "Chain of Custody" would be the recovery of a bloody knife at a murder scene:
Officer Andrew collects the knife and places it into a container, then gives it to forensics technician
Bill. Forensics technician Bill takes the knife to the lab and collects fingerprints and other evidence
from the knife. Bill then gives the knife and all evidence gathered from the knife to evidence clerk
Charlene. Charlene then stores the evidence until it is needed, documenting everyone who has
accessed the original evidence (the knife, and original copies of the lifted fingerprints).
The Chain of Custody requires that from the moment the evidence is collected, every transfer of
evidence from person to person be documented and that it be provable that nobody else could
have accessed that evidence. It is best to keep the number of transfers as low as possible.
In the courtroom, if the defendant questions the Chain of Custody of the evidence it can be proven
that the knife in the evidence room is the same knife found at the crime scene. However, if there are discrepancies and it cannot be proven who had the knife at a particular point in time, then the Chain of Custody is broken and the defendant can ask to have the resulting evidence declared inadmissible.
"Chain of custody" is also used in most chemical sampling situations to maintain the integrity of the sample by providing documentation of the control, transfer, and analysis of samples. Chain of custody is especially important in environmental work where sampling can identify the existence of contamination and can be used to identify the responsible party.
REFERENCES: Hernandez CISSP, Steven (2012-12-21). Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK, Third Edition ((ISC)2 Press) (Kindle Locations 23173-23185). Auerbach Publications. Kindle Edition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentary_evidence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_evidence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_evidence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonstrative_evidence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_evidence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain_of_custody

NEW QUESTION # 867
With MAC, who may NOT make decisions that derive from policy?

• A. The guests.
• B. The administrator.
• C. The power users.
• D. All users except the administrator.

Answer: D

Explanation:
As the name implies, the Mandatory Access Control defines an imposed access control level. MAC is defined as follows in the Handbook of Information Security Management: With mandatory controls, only administrators and not owners of resources may make decisions that bear on or derive from policy. Only an administrator may change the category of a resource, and no one may grant a right of access that is explicitly forbidden in the access control policy.

NEW QUESTION # 868
Attributes that characterize an attack are stored for reference using which of the following Intrusion Detection System (IDS)?

• A. inference-based IDS
• B. signature-based IDS
• C. event-based IDS
• D. statistical anomaly-based IDS

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:
A signature based IDS monitors packets and compares them against a database of signatures or attributes from known malicious threats.
Incorrect Answers:
B: An IDS which is anomaly based monitors network traffic and compares it against an established baseline, which identifies what is "normal" for that network, and the alerts the relevant party when traffic is detected which is significantly different to the baseline.
C, D: These are not valid IDS types.
References:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrusion_detection_system
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomaly-based_intrusion_detection_system

NEW QUESTION # 869
What is the length of an MD5 message digest?

• A. varies depending upon the message size.
• B. 256 bits
• C. 128 bits
• D. 160 bits

Answer: C

Explanation:
A hash algorithm (alternatively, hash "function") takes binary data, called the message, and produces a condensed representation, called the message digest. A cryptographic hash algorithm is a hash algorithm that is designed to achieve certain security properties. The Federal Information Processing Standard 180-3, Secure Hash Standard, specifies five cryptographic hash algorithms - SHA-1, SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512 for federal use in the US; the standard was also widely adopted by the information technology industry and commercial companies.
The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is a widely used cryptographic hash function that produces a 128-bit (16-byte) hash value. Specified in RFC 1321, MD5 has been employed in a wide variety of security applications, and is also commonly used to check data integrity. MD5 was designed by Ron Rivest in 1991 to replace an earlier hash function, MD4. An MD5 hash is typically expressed as a 32-digit hexadecimal number.
However, it has since been shown that MD5 is not collision resistant; as such, MD5 is not suitable for applications like SSL certificates or digital signatures that rely on this property. In 1996, a flaw was found with the design of MD5, and while it was not a clearly fatal weakness, cryptographers began recommending the use of other algorithms, such as SHA-1 - which has since been found also to be vulnerable. In 2004, more serious flaws were discovered in MD5, making further use of the algorithm for security purposes questionable - specifically, a group of researchers described how to create a pair of files that share the same MD5 checksum. Further advances were made in breaking MD5 in 2005, 2006, and 2007. In December 2008, a group of researchers used this technique to fake SSL certificate validity, and US-CERT now says that MD5 "should be considered cryptographically broken and unsuitable for further use." and most U.S. government applications now require the SHA-2 family of hash functions.
NIST CRYPTOGRAPHIC HASH PROJECT NIST announced a public competition in a Federal Register Notice on November 2, 2007 to develop a new cryptographic hash algorithm, called SHA-3, for standardization. The competition was NIST's response to advances made in the cryptanalysis of hash algorithms.
NIST received sixty-four entries from cryptographers around the world by October 31, 2008, and selected fifty-one first-round candidates in December 2008, fourteen second-round candidates in July 2009, and five finalists - BLAKE, Grostl, JH, Keccak and Skein, in December 2010 to advance to the third and final round of the competition.
Throughout the competition, the cryptographic community has provided an enormous amount of feedback. Most of the comments were sent to NIST and a public hash forum; in addition, many of the cryptanalysis and performance studies were published as papers in major cryptographic conferences or leading cryptographic journals. NIST also hosted a SHA-3 candidate conference in each round to obtain public feedback. Based on the public comments and internal review of the candidates, NIST announced Keccak as the winner of the SHA-3 Cryptographic Hash Algorithm Competition on October 2, 2012, and ended the five-year competition.
Reference:
Tipton, Harold, et. al., Officical (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK, 2007 edition, page 261.
and
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Md5
and
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/hash/sha-3/index.html

NEW QUESTION # 870
The Wireless Transport Layer Security (WTLS) Protocol in the Wireless
Application Protocol (WAP) stack is based on which Internet Security
Protocol?

• A. SET
• B. S-HTTP
• C. TLS
• D. IPSEC

Answer: C

Explanation:
TLS is discussed in the answer to question 5. WTLS has to incorporate
functionality that is provided for in TLS by TCP in the TCP/IP
Protocol suite in that WTLS can operate over UDP. WTLS supports
data privacy, authentication and integrity. Because WTLS has to
incorporate a large number of handshakes when security is implemented,
significant delays may occur. During a WTLS handshake
session, WTLS can set up the following security classes:
Class 1. No certificates
Class 2. The client does not have a certificate; the server has a
certificate
Class 3. The client and server have certificates

NEW QUESTION # 871
......

Exam CISSP Guide Materials: https://www.getvalidtest.com/CISSP-exam.html